← Peptide library

Peptide comparison

CJC-1295 vs Ipamorelin

CJC-1295 vs Ipamorelin

This page compares CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin side by side, drawing on the published reference data for each compound. Both are research peptides, and the points below summarize how each is characterized in its respective cited human studies. The aim is to lay out the reference details for both in one place, not to endorse either one.

CJC-1295

Ipamorelin

Regulatory status

Regulatory status

Investigational; not FDA-approved

Investigational/discontinued; not FDA-approved

Evidence tier

Evidence tier

Published Phase 1 human studies

Published Phase 2 human RCT; negative primary endpoint

Route

Route

Subcutaneous (CJC-1295 with DAC in cited study)

Intravenous in cited trial

Frequency

Frequency

Single or study-scheduled

Twice daily (IV study)

Study / label range

Study / label range

30–60 mcg/kg

0.03 mg/kg

CJC-1295 vs Ipamorelin: at a glance

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin compared on regulatory status, route, frequency and published dose range
AttributeCJC-1295Ipamorelin
Regulatory statusInvestigational; not FDA-approvedInvestigational/discontinued; not FDA-approved
RouteSubcutaneous (CJC-1295 with DAC in cited study)Intravenous in cited trial
Dosing frequencySingle or study-scheduledTwice daily (IV study)
Published range30-60 mcg/kg0.03 mg/kg
Evidence basisPublished Phase 1 human studiesPublished Phase 2 human RCT; negative primary endpoint
What the source describesHealthy-adult studies examined 30 and 60 mcg/kg among ascending doses; protocol-controlledPostoperative ileus trial used 0.03 mg/kg IV twice daily up to 7 days; primary endpoint not met
FormulationWeight-based conversion supported mathematically, but CJC-1295 with DAC must not be confused with 'no-DAC' products.Do not use the IV study value as a subcutaneous protocol. No established outpatient injectable dose.

Every value is quoted from each compound's own labeling or published trial, listed in the sources below. A published range describes what has been studied or labeled - it is not a recommendation, and this page does not advise choosing one compound over the other. There is no valid dose conversion between two different compounds.

What is not established

Limits of the available evidence for each compound
CompoundEstablished dose rangeStated limitation
CJC-129530-60 mcg/kgLimited data; FDA notes serious adverse events including increased heart rate and vasodilatory reaction.
Ipamorelin0.03 mg/kgFDA notes immunogenicity/impurity concerns and serious adverse events including death in IV study context.

Sources

Primary source behind each compound's entry above
CompoundPrimary sourceChecked
CJC-1295PubMed - PMID 163526832026-06-24
IpamorelinPubMed - PMID 253310302026-06-24

INTERACTIVE

Plan the CJC-1295 + ipamorelin co-draw

These two are commonly run together as a growth-hormone-secretagogue stack. Reconstitute each in its own vial, then plan the same-syringe co-draw — the tool works out the concentration and U-100 units to draw for each. Edit vial size, water, and dose to match your own. Arithmetic only — not medical advice.

CJC-1295 + ipamorelin co-draw calculator X

Reconstitute each vial, then plan the same-syringe co-draw and read U-100 units for each.

Arithmetic + reference toolNot medical advice
Inputs
Research context
Product form
Target dose
Weight unit
Syringe barrel
Draw to
50units
0.5 mL5 mg/mL2.5 mg / dose
1 mL syringe - 100 u/mLFits
50 u050100 u
ARITHMETIC OK - VERIFY CLINICALLY

Arithmetic checks out. Confirm clinically, against the label, and against the actual vial before any use.

10 mg
4
0 mg
28 days

Independent check - dose mg / concentration mg/mL = volume. U-100 units = mL x 100.

Blend planner

Same-syringe co-draw. Reconstitute each peptide in its own vial, then draw them into one syringe.

Co-draw
2.5 mg/mLDraw 4 u · 0.04 mL
2.5 mg/mLDraw 4 u · 0.04 mL
Combined draw
Fits 1 mL8 u0.08 mL
  • Reconstitute each peptide in its own vial — never add water to multiple peptides in one vial.
  • Only co-draw peptides with the same diluent (e.g. both bacteriostatic water) and compatible pH.
  • Draw and inject fresh — do not pre-mix and store; mixture stability is not established.
  • No blended stack is clinically validated. Verify each component and confirm with a clinician.
Formula and source context only. Not medical advice; verify with a clinician, product label, pharmacist, or approved research protocol. Do not use this tool to infer sterility, potency, purity, stability, compatibility, or an appropriate dose. Catalog and supply-chain data: finnrick.com/products - research date 2026-06-24.

Key differences

On regulatory status, both are investigational and neither is FDA-approved, though Ipamorelin is additionally noted as discontinued. Their evidence tiers differ: CJC-1295 is backed by published Phase 1 human studies, while Ipamorelin’s cited record is a published Phase 2 human randomized controlled trial whose primary endpoint was not met.

Reference comparison only. Not medical advice; verify with a clinician, product label, pharmacist, or approved research protocol.

Frequently asked questions

How are CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin administered in the cited studies?

They differ. The CJC-1295 figures here come from a subcutaneous study of CJC-1295 with DAC, while the Ipamorelin figures come from an intravenous clinical trial. Both are investigational and not FDA-approved.

What dose figures does this comparison reference?

Weight-based study figures shown above — CJC-1295 30–60 mcg/kg and Ipamorelin 0.03 mg/kg. These come from the cited research and are reference figures only, not dosing recommendations.

Can I calculate reconstitution for both here?

Yes — open either compound’s calculator from the buttons above to convert your own inputs into concentration (mg/mL), draw volume and U-100 syringe units.

Does this page recommend one over the other?

No. Both are investigational research peptides. This page is a neutral reference and does not assess efficacy, safety, or suitability — those decisions belong with a qualified professional.